Critical analysis of Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq

Critical analysis of Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq

Critical analysis of Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq : Tughlaq is a historical play that deals with the life and ambitions of a Muslim king Muhammad Tughlaq (1327-32 A.D.) The action of the play takes place first of all in Delhi and then Daulatabad. It is a compelling allegory of the Nehruvian era.

Critical analysis of Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq

Written during his studies at Oxford, Tughlaq captures the disillusionment of many Indians with the idealistic policies of early independent India. In its canvas and treatment, Tughlaq is both huge and contemporary. It is a tale of the crumbling to the ashes of the dreams and aspirations of an over-ambitious, yet considerably virtuous king.

Despite the Sultan’s foolishness to shift the capital of India from Delhi to Daulatabad to “centralize administration”, despite the high headedness of making copper coins equal in value to silver dinars, despite the shamefulness of designing a conspiracy to kill his own brother and father at prayer hall, what is remarkable and relatively unknown, in the much infamous characters of Tughlaq is the willingness to work for the people and to ensure their happiness, the courage to take initiative in the direction of communal equality, and a keenly observing and ever-diligent mind.

The disappointment in the end when he is not understood by his own people and followers is obvious. And Karnad captures it beautifully in his inimitable style.

Karnad’s Tughlaq is a carefully executed play depicting the life of a king which is full of ups and downs. It has tremendous theatrical potential. The play offers fresh psychological insights into the character of Tughlaq. He is presented as a highly learned man and an absolutely unrelenting ruler. He is a visionary king, who wants to work for the welfare of the masses.

His wants to achieve peace, prosperity and harmony in his state. But the people around him fail to understand his vision and they go to the extent of conspiring against him. He defeats Ain-ul-Mulk by political treachery and gets Sheikh-Imam-ud-din killed using intrigue. Kingship is an important motif in the play. In order to protect his kingship he becomes a tyrant but kingship is a burden and Tughlaq learns his lessons in kingship a hard way.

Tughlaq has a very great puzzling quality which cannot be reduced to the minimum. This quality comes from the ambiguities of the character of Tughlaq who is the dominating personality of the play. All the other characters are the dramatized aspects of Tughlaq’s personality. The play is also notable for the symmetries of the game of chess.

The theme of disguise and ironic success of Aziz runs parallel to the story of Tughlaq. The character of Tughlaq is related to philosophical questions on the nature of man and the destiny of a whole kingdom which is controlled and swayed by a dreamer and a visionary like Tughlaq.

Chess is the most important symbol used by Karnad. Muhammad doesn’t play chess as a pastime; he plays it to solve intricate problems. Through chess Karnad has highlighted Muhammad’s manipulative skills in the dealing with his adversaries.

Use of prayer is also a symbol in the play. Tughlaq killed his father and brother while they were praying. The Courtiers conspire to murder Tughlaq at prayer. The use of prayer for murder is reminiscent to what Tughlaq himself did to kill his father and brother. The prayer was symbolic of the fact that life is corrupted at the very source. When Tughlaq’s step-mother is ordered to be stoned to death for getting Najib poisoned, Muhammad falls on his knees and prays to God to “have pity on me.

I have no one but You now.” Tughlaq stops prayer for five years in his kingdom. At the end when the Sultan seeks the blessing of Ghiyas-ud-din-Abbasid to start prayers in his kingdom after a lapse of five years. The people are starving and they want food and not prayer. Ironically the Sultan fails to wake up in time for prayer at the end of the play because he is dazed.

The python symbol used to describe the road form Delhi to Daulatabad is scene VIII is indicative of Muhammad’s barbarity and inhumanity. The python also symbolizes the increased ferocity and blood thirstiness of Muhammad. It symbolizes the complete degeneration of his personality. Daulatabad, earlier known as Deogiri, is a Hindu city. Muhammad wants to move his capital from Delhi to Daulatabad not only in the interest of a centralized and effective administration but also to develop the city as a symbol of Hindu [1]Muslim unity. But instead, it leads to rioting and bloodshed.

Aziz and Aazam, the two petty thieves and timeservers symbolize opportunistic and unprincipled people who exploit liberal ideas and welfare schemes of the Sultan to line their own pockets. They are true of all times and climes. They are unscrupulous people who exploit the people’s misery and sufferings to their own advantage. But this world revolves round one central figure of the hero in Tughlaq which is the source of the entire tragedy. The play gets “an elusive and haunting quality” from the character of Muhammad, who has been realized in great psychological depth.

Read it also: Summary of Tughlaq by Girish Karnad

1 thought on “Critical analysis of Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq”

Leave a Comment