Critical Analysis of the Poem King Fisher

Critical Analysis of the Poem King Fisher by Daud Kamal

Critical Analysis of the Poem King Fisher : The poem King Fisher, by Daud Kamal, is a poem in which the speaker reflects on life and death. The speaker begins by saying that he will die soon but does not fear it. He gives his reasons for this lack of fear as being due to the “little time left”, the fact that it will happen soon and because he has already lived so long. He believes that death is just a part of life and sees it as necessary to have birthdays.

Critical Analysis of the Poem King Fisher


The poem “King Fisher” by Daud Kamal is a beautiful and haunting poem about a kingfisher that has been killed. The poem starts with the kingfisher’s body being found by a boy, who is devastated by the sight. The boy then goes on to bury the kingfisher, and as he does so, he thinks about how the bird was so full of life just moments before. The poem ends with the boy wondering if the kingfisher’s spirit will now be able to fly free.

Plot Summary

The poem “King Fisher” by Daud Kamal is a critical analysis of the role of a king in society. The speaker in the poem is a king who is sitting on his throne, surrounded by his courtiers and advisors. He is bored with his life and wonders what it would be like to be a king fisher, which is a bird that dives into water to catch fish. The king thinks about how the king fisher is free to do whatever it wants, while he is stuck in his palace with all the responsibilities of being a king. The speaker eventually decides that he would rather be a king fisher than a king.

Character Analysis in Poem King Fisher

The King Fisher by Daud Kamal is a poem that tells the story of a kingfisher bird who is captured by a fisher. The bird is then brought to the king, who orders that the bird be set free. However, the bird is not able to fly away and is eventually killed by the king. This poem provides a critical analysis of the character of the king in terms of his actions and motives. The poem also raises questions about the nature of justice and mercy, and whether they can be found in the world of humans.

The narrative voice in this poem is one of an outsider who has a certain distance from the events described in the story. The reader, therefore, cannot clearly see the motives and actions of the characters involved—the king and his subjects. While it can be argued that the authorial voice is biased, there are many instances in which this is not explicit.

For example, when describing how the king killed the bird that he had ordered to be set free, there are no indications of whether this was justified by any moral code whatsoever. This poem thus presents a form of justice that exists outside any code or law—a justice of personal conscience instead of respecting laws and codes.

This universal viewpoint also allows for ambiguity in terms of justice. Justice is offered to the reader in the form of an alternative perception of the world, giving a new perspective on reality, which can be interpreted as just or unjust depending on the viewpoint of the reader.

The authorial voice is not “value-laden” but has no specific moral code by which it produces its depictions. It merely presents various actions and perspectives to allow for open interpretation by the reader—and thus allows for different perceptions of “justice” within its world.

There are various instances where justice is ambiguous or where judgments are left up to the reader—in other words, the story leaves room for many interpretations. For example, it can be argued that justice is served when a king claims his power and kills those who betrayed him, or it can be argued that justice is served when a king is killed for disobeying his country’s values.

The author’s voice in this story provides insight into the reality of justice at a time when the concepts of law and order were being formed. The reader must discern whether he or she supports kings who rule with an iron fist, or whether such power should be stripped from them and given to the people themselves.

Both sides of the argument are presented fairly and impartially—the authorial voice does not take any side, but simply presents both perspectives so readers can make up their own minds based on their personal beliefs.

Symbolism Analysis in Poem King Fisher

The poem King Fisher by Daud Kamal is a perfect example of how symbolism can be used to add deeper meaning to a work of literature. The title itself is a symbol for the king of the birds, and the poem uses this symbol to explore the idea of power and responsibility. The king fisher is described as “bold and fearless”, which are qualities that are often associated with leaders.

However, the poem also suggests that the king fisher is not always wise, and that he sometimes makes mistakes. This symbolizes the way that even the most powerful people can make mistakes and be fallible. The poem ends with the king fisher doing what it is supposed to do, which is catch a fish. This emphasizes that even though the king fisher may make mistakes and may not always be wise, he is still required to do his job, even when he would rather not.

In conclusion King Fisher by Daud Kamal is an example of how symbolism can be used to add deeper meaning to a work of literature. The title itself functions as a symbol for the king of the birds, and this symbol is used throughout the poem to explore the idea of responsibility and power.

Theme Analysis

The poem King Fisher by Daud Kamal is a reflective piece that looks at the life of a king fisher bird. Themes that are explored in the poem include: nature, death, and the cycle of life. Nature.

The first stanza is about the natural instincts of a king fisher bird. King fisher birds are known for their habit of singing and catching flies in flight, and this stanza captures both behaviors. We learn quite a bit about the bird’s lifestyle from this stanza.

The second stanza begins by describing the bird’s death, “But when time came to die, / It sang again in death its song of life.” In this stanza we see that even at the end of its life, nature has provided for this creature by providing it with food. Nature has also provided for the bird after it dies by using its body as food for other creatures – the nature cycle continues even after the bird’s death.

The narrator tells us that even in death, the bird is providing food to others while it waits for its body to be used as a seed by another plant. This stanza encourages us to think about the importance of each living thing in nature and how every small part of life affects the whole.

The third stanza continues this idea by describing nature’s cycle of life and death as an old man whose “time was come…/ And he said, I have lived my time. / My sun has set; but yours is at hand.” The old man tells the young grass that his time has been fulfilled but tells him to stay cheerful because his time will come soon. This stanza sets up the fourth and final stanza.

The last stanza describes a new beginning. It is written from the perspective of nature, who has seen many days come and go. This stanza assures that even though one generation of living things passes away, another will take its place and continue to conduct the cycle of life.

This poem can be read in any order because it only uses four rhymes: time, time, sun, sun; and then, came, came; life/seeds; and dawn/dawn. The word pairings are not always hard to find because they all follow a chronological pattern.


The poem King Fisher by Daud Kamal is a beautiful and poetic exploration of the kingfisher bird. The poet uses rich language and imagery to paint a picture of this magnificent creature in all its glory. The poem is also a notable example of how nature can be used to symbolize various aspects of our own lives and relationships.

 Read it also:

Spring Season Essay

10 Lines on Peacock

Leave a Comment